Psystar Loses Key Copyright Ruling In Apple's California Lawsuit
|by C. Stiles|
|Robert Pedraza at Psystar headquarters in Doral.|
That chance just got slimmer. U.S. District Judge William Alsup has granted Apple a summary judgment, agreeing that Psystar infringed on its copyright.
"Psystar infringed Apple's exclusive rights to create derivative works of Mac OS X," Alsup writes, "by replacing original files in Mac OS X with unauthorized software files."
Alsup also agreed with Apple that Psystar violated portions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The judge, in the same ruling, tossed out all of Psystar's requests for a summary judgment.
So is this the end of the line for Psystar? No. There's still a good bit of legal conflict to sort out.
"We think that the court got the law wrong, particularly on copyright misuse," Kiwi Camara, Psystar's lawyer, tells Riptide. "Psystar will fight on in Florida and in the Court of Appeals."
Alsup still has to rule on Apple's claims that Psystar violated contract law by going against the click-through agreement on OS X. Complaints over unfair competition, trademark infringement and trademark dilution remain unresolved.
And Psystar's separate lawsuit against Apple in Florida, claiming that the company violated anti-trust laws, is ongoing.
But there's no doubt: Alsup's ruling is a Messi-esque kick in the balls for Psystar and the Pedrazas. Alsup has set hearings for later this month to decide how much money Psystar owes Apple for the violations, and there's a good chance the answer will be "a hell of a lot."
But let's be clear: No, we don't regret profiling these guys in light of Alsup's ruling. Why would we?
The Pedraza's personal story is damned fascinating, and was never told before we reported it. The legal arguments we've explored are valid and interesting. None of that changes because a judge in California has agreed with Apple on some key issues.
Read the full ruling: Summaryjudgment.pdf