As Commission Votes On Clear Channel's 14 New LED Billboards, Activists Protest
|Sarnoff, the city's biggest billboard backer, has taken thousands from advertising companies.|
This morning, the Miami Commission will decide whether to give Clear Channel the go ahead for the new signs, even though activists argue they're unsafe and against state and federal law. We're sure the fact that Sarnoff has received thousands from outdoor advertisers will play zero role in this process.
The amendment doesn't specify where Clear Channel will build the new signs and would require the sign company to remove 38 older signs around town in return.
The problem is that LED signs clearly violate local, state and federal sign codes, says Barbara Bisno, a former federal prosecutor and activist on the issue.
Worse, they likely impact driver safety. Bisno says she's worried that Clear Channel is rushing through the new amendment to beat a federal safety study on the signs that's due to be released soon.
"If they show that these signs are dangerous, someone will have to move them and it could easily cost taxpayers big money," she says.
"This is a question of public safety, not just of citizens against big corporations."
Sarnoff is expected to miss today's meeting, but Bisno says she's been told a hearty letter of support from the commish will be read in favor of the new project.
As we reported last fall, Sarnoff has received more than $5,000 in corporate donations from outdoor advertising companies while becoming the biggest backer of new billboards -- including a failed push for 40-story ads next to the Arsht Center.
"It troubles me greatly that you and your fellow commissioners approved resolutions which provided for illegal signs and did not give notice to residents of the precise locations of these LED billboards," she writes. "The residents who oppose this visual pollution will stay on the job."